Correspondence with matrices
We can identify the transformation
\(\hspace{5cm}T\left( z\right) =\frac{az+b}{cz+d}\)
with the matrix
.
this identification is useful because of the following algebraic facts.
1. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\) If \(r≠0\) then
and \(r\)
correspond to the same FLT.
Proof : This follows from the obvious equality
\(\hspace{4cm}\frac{az+b}{cz+d}=\frac{raz+rb}{rcz+rd}.\)
2. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\) If \(T(z)\) corresponds to
and \(S(z)\) corresponds to
then composition \(T∘S(z)\) corresponds to matrix multiplication \(AB.\)
Proof : The proof is just a bit of algebra.
\(\hspace{1cm}T\circ S\left( z\right) =T\left( \frac{ez+f}{gz+h}\right) =\frac{a\left(\frac{\left( ez+f\right) }{\left( gz+h\right) }\right) +b}{c\left( \frac{\left( ez+f\right) }{\left( gz+h\right) }\right) +d}=\frac{\left(ae+bg\right) z+af+bh}{\left( ce+dg\right) z+cf+dh}\)
\(\hspace{2cm}\)
The claimed correspondence is clear from the last entries in the two lines above.
3. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\) If \(T(z)\) corresponds to
then \(T\) has an inverse and \(T^{-1}(w)\) corresponds to \(A^{-1}\) and also to
i.e . to \(A^{-1}\) without the factor of \(\frac{1}{det(A)}\).
Proof : Since \(AA^{-1}=I\) it is clear from the previous fact that \(T^{-1}\) corresponds to \(A^{-1}\). Since
\(\hspace{5cm}A^{-1}=\frac{1}{ad-bc}\)
Fact \(1\) implies \(A^{-1}\) and
both correspond to the same FLT, i.e. to \(T^{-1}\).
Examples
1. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\)The matrix
corresponds to \(T(z)=az+b.\).
2. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\) The matrix
corresponds to rotation by \(2α.\)
3. \(\hspace{0,5cm}\)The matrix
corresponds to the inversion \(w=\frac{1}{z}.\)